Linear vs Height: which should you choose?
Quick answer: Linear is built for engineering and product teams, while Height suits product and engineering teams. For most users Height is the stronger default, but Linear can be the better fit depending on your budget and use case.
Linear versus Height comes down to which trade-offs you can live with. Below we compare them on pricing, strengths and the use cases each one fits, then give a clear verdict.
Side-by-side
| Linear | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | software development PM | software development PM |
| What it's known for | Fast, keyboard-driven issue tracker and project planner built for modern software teams, with sleek UX, cycles, roadmaps and strong Git integrations. | AI-native project management tool that automates triage, backlog grooming and updates, positioning itself as an autonomous project manager for product teams. |
| Pricing | Free plan; Basic from ~$8/user/mo; Business ~$14/user/mo; Enterprise custom (billed annually). | Free tier; paid Team plans for Height 2.0 with AI features (per-user pricing, verify current rate on signup). |
| Best audience | Startups and product/engineering teams valuing speed, UX and tight Git workflows. | Historically, product/engineering teams wanting AI to offload triage; no longer operating. |
| Best for | Engineering and product teams, Startups valuing speed/UX, Issue tracking with Git workflows | Product and engineering teams, Teams wanting AI automation, Lean startups |
| Entry price | Free | Free |
| Biggest strength | Exceptional speed and UX; loved by engineering teams. | Pioneered autonomous AI project management for product teams. |
| Main caveat | Free plan capped at 2 teams and 250 active issues. | Discontinued: final day of service was 24 September 2025, app no longer available. |
Features compared
Where they really diverge is in the day-to-day feature set:
Linear key features
- Fast, keyboard-driven issue tracking with command palette
- Cycles (sprints) and project/roadmap planning
- Triage inbox for incoming requests
- Insights analytics (paid)
Height key features
- AI-native project management with autonomous bug triage
- Automated backlog grooming and spec/doc updates
- Teams spaces and integrated Documents
- Tasks with multiple views (list, Kanban, calendar, spreadsheet)
Pricing tiers side by side
Linear plans
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Unlimited members, 2 teams, 250 active issues, Slack & GitHub, AI agents |
| Basic | $10/user/mo (annual) | Unlimited issues, 5 teams, unlimited file uploads, admin roles |
| Business | $16/user/mo (annual) | Unlimited/private teams, guest access, Linear Agent, Insights |
| Enterprise | Custom | Advanced security, SAML/SCIM, SLAs |
Height plans
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Free (historical) | $0 | Up to 10 members, 2 teams, 1,000 active tasks; service ended Sept 2025 |
| Paid (historical) | ~$8-24/member/mo | Tiered seat add-ons; product discontinued 24 Sept 2025 |
Tiers compiled from the vendors' published plans and independent reviews; prices are approximate and change often, so confirm current figures (and your region's taxes) on each vendor's site.
Strengths compared
Where Linear wins
A blazing-fast, keyboard-first issue tracker with a design polish that engineering teams rave about.
- Exceptional speed and UX; loved by engineering teams.
- Unlimited members on the free plan.
That makes it the stronger pick for startups and product/engineering teams valuing speed, UX and tight Git workflows.
Where Height wins
An early autonomous-AI project manager for product teams, now shut down (service ended Sept 2025).
- Pioneered autonomous AI project management for product teams.
- All AI capabilities were included on every plan.
That makes it the stronger pick for historically, product/engineering teams wanting AI to offload triage; no longer operating.
Verdict: choose by fit
There is no single winner; it depends on where you sit.
- Choose Linear if you fit its core audience — startups and product/engineering teams valuing speed, UX and tight Git workflows.
- Choose Height if you fit its core audience — historically, product/engineering teams wanting AI to offload triage; no longer operating.
FAQ
Is Linear better than Height?
Height is the stronger default for most users, but Linear can be the better fit depending on your budget and use case.
What is the main difference between Linear and Height?
Linear is a blazing-fast, keyboard-first issue tracker with a design polish that engineering teams rave about. Height is an early autonomous-AI project manager for product teams, now shut down (service ended Sept 2025).
Which is cheaper, Linear or Height?
Both Linear and Height offer a free tier, so the real comparison is the paid plans above — pick based on the storage, features and limits you actually need.
Sources
Facts above are drawn from these independent reviews and the vendors' own pages for Linear and Height: